Table of Contents
- Comparrison of RoHS vs REACH at a Glance
- What Is the Difference Between RoHS and REACH?
- RoHS focuses on restricted substances in electrical and electronic equipment
- Does REACH have a broader chemicals focus
- Are RoHS and REACH the Same?
- Does RoHS Compliance Mean REACH Compliance?
- When Do Manufacturers Need to Consider Both RoHS and REACH?
- RoHS assessment
- REACH assessment
- RoHS vs REACH: How the Supply-Chain Data Differs
- Can the Same Supplier Data Support Both RoHS and REACH?
- RoHS Exemptions and REACH Restrictions Are Different
- How Manufacturers Can Manage RoHS and REACH Together
- RoHS vs REACH: What Manufacturers Should Remember
- Conclusion
RoHS and REACH are both European Union chemical-related compliance requirements, but they are not the same regulation. RoHS primarily restricts specific hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment, while REACH is a broader chemicals regulation covering the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemical substances.
For manufacturers of electrical and electronic products, the two requirements can overlap. However, compliance with RoHS does not automatically mean compliance with REACH.
The practical question for manufacturers is therefore not simply whether a product is RoHS compliant or REACH compliant. It is whether the product, its components, materials and supply chain information have been assessed against each requirement that applies.
Comparrison of RoHS vs REACH at a Glance
RoHS | REACH | |
|---|---|---|
Full name | Restriction of Hazardous Substances | Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals |
Primary purpose | Restrict specified hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment | Manage risks from chemical substances and protect human health and the environment |
Main focus | Restricted substances in EEE | Chemical substances, mixtures and substances in articles |
Applies primarily to | Electrical and electronic equipment within scope | Manufacturers, importers, downstream users and suppliers, depending on the obligation |
Key mechanisms | Substance restrictions, exemptions and conformity assessment | Registration, authorisation, restriction and supply-chain communication |
Relationship | Product-focused substance restrictions | Broader chemical regulatory framework |
Can one replace the other? | No | No |
REACH restrictions can apply to substances on their own, in mixtures or in articles, while REACH also creates other obligations depending on the substance, use and role of the company in the supply chain.
What Is the Difference Between RoHS and REACH?
The biggest difference is what each regulation is designed to control.
RoHS focuses on restricted substances in electrical and electronic equipment
RoHS, established through Directive 2011/65/EU and its amendments, restricts specified substances in electrical and electronic equipment.
For manufacturers, the compliance question is essentially:
Does the electrical or electronic equipment contain restricted substances above the applicable limits, taking into account any applicable exemptions?
The assessment therefore involves the product, its components, materials and the evidence supporting the material composition.
For a detailed explanation of RoHS applicability, see Scope of EU RoHS Compliance.
Does REACH have a broader chemicals focus
REACH applies to chemical substances across their lifecycle and includes mechanisms such as registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction.
Depending on the company's role and the substance involved, REACH obligations can apply to substances, mixtures and articles.
For articles containing Candidate List substances, REACH can also create supply-chain communication obligations. ECHA states that suppliers of relevant articles must provide information when a Candidate List substance is present above 0.1% by weight, subject to the applicable requirements.
This is why a manufacturer cannot treat RoHS and REACH as interchangeable requirements.
Are RoHS and REACH the Same?
No. RoHS and REACH have different scopes, mechanisms and compliance obligations.
They can address some of the same substances, but they regulate them through different frameworks.
For example, a substance may be restricted under RoHS for electrical and electronic equipment while a different REACH obligation may apply to the same substance based on its use, concentration, article status or position in the supply chain.
The presence of an overlapping substance therefore does not make the two assessments identical.
Does RoHS Compliance Mean REACH Compliance?
No. RoHS compliance does not automatically establish REACH compliance.
A manufacturer can meet the applicable RoHS substance restrictions and still need to assess separate REACH obligations.
The reason is simple: the regulations ask different questions.
RoHS asks:
Are the applicable restricted substances in the EEE within the relevant limits or covered by an applicable exemption?
REACH may require manufacturers or other supply-chain actors to consider:
What substances are involved, what obligations apply to the company's role, and are registration, authorisation, restriction or communication requirements triggered?
REACH restrictions can apply to substances, mixtures and articles, and its Candidate List can trigger specific obligations for substances in articles.
When Do Manufacturers Need to Consider Both RoHS and REACH?
Manufacturers of electrical and electronic equipment may need to consider both when their products fall within the relevant RoHS scope and their materials, substances or supply-chain relationships create applicable REACH obligations.
A practical assessment can therefore involve two parallel questions:
RoHS assessment
- Is the product within RoHS scope?
- Which restricted substances are relevant?
- Do applicable concentration limits need to be assessed?
- Are any exemptions relevant?
- Is sufficient compliance evidence available?
REACH assessment
- Which substances or articles are involved?
- What is the company's role in the supply chain?
- Are registration obligations relevant?
- Are authorisation or restriction requirements relevant?
- Are Candidate List communication or notification obligations triggered?
REACH registration obligations, for example, can apply to companies manufacturing or importing substances above the applicable one-tonne-per-year threshold, subject to the regulation's provisions and exemptions.
This is why manufacturers should assess the two regulations separately even when the same product is being evaluated.
RoHS vs REACH: How the Supply-Chain Data Differs
One of the biggest practical differences for manufacturers is the type of information needed from suppliers.
For RoHS, manufacturers commonly need information that helps establish whether components and materials meet the applicable substance restrictions.
For REACH, the information required can depend on the substance, article, use and the company's role in the supply chain.
For articles containing Candidate List substances, suppliers may have communication obligations, and producers or importers can need information about substances present in their articles.
This means a single generic supplier declaration may not answer every compliance question.
A better approach is to maintain regulation-specific evidence linked to the relevant component, material and product.
Can the Same Supplier Data Support Both RoHS and REACH?
Yes, some supplier information can support both assessments, but it should not automatically be treated as sufficient for both.
A supplier may provide material composition information that helps a manufacturer evaluate multiple requirements.
However, each regulation has its own scope, thresholds, definitions and obligations.
The manufacturer should therefore determine:
- What information was actually provided
- Which component or material it covers
- When the information was issued
- Which regulatory requirement it supports
- Whether additional information is required
This avoids a common compliance mistake: treating one supplier declaration as a universal compliance certificate.
For the separate issue of evaluating the reliability of supplier declarations and when testing may be necessary, see RoHS Compliance: When Declarations Pass but Testing Fails.
RoHS Exemptions and REACH Restrictions Are Different
The terms exemption and restriction should not be treated as interchangeable.
RoHS contains specific exemptions that can permit certain restricted substance uses under defined conditions.
REACH uses different mechanisms, including restrictions under Annex XVII and authorisation requirements for certain substances. ECHA describes REACH restrictions as measures that can limit or prohibit the manufacture, placing on the market or use of substances, including certain substances in articles.
Therefore:
A RoHS exemption does not automatically create a REACH exemption.
If a manufacturer relies on a RoHS exemption, it should still assess whether separate REACH obligations apply.
For RoHS-specific exemption requirements, see RoHS Directive Regulations & Exemptions.
How Manufacturers Can Manage RoHS and REACH Together
The most effective approach is not to create one generic compliance record labelled "RoHS/REACH."
Instead, manufacturers can maintain a connected compliance structure:
Supplier
↓
Component
↓
Material / Substance Information
↓
Regulatory Assessment
↓
Product
↓
Compliance Evidence
This allows the same underlying material information to support multiple regulatory assessments while keeping each regulation's requirements distinct.
For manufacturers managing large product portfolios, this becomes particularly important because supplier information can change and the same component may appear in multiple products.
RoHS vs REACH: What Manufacturers Should Remember
The key distinction is straightforward:
RoHS is primarily concerned with restricting specified hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment.
REACH is a broader chemicals regulation covering mechanisms including registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction, with obligations that can apply differently depending on substances, articles, uses and supply-chain roles.
The two frameworks can overlap, but one does not replace the other.
For manufacturers, the practical objective is to determine which requirements apply, collect the right supplier and material information, assess each regulation correctly and maintain evidence that can be traced back to the relevant products and components.
Conclusion
RoHS and REACH overlap in some areas, but they solve different regulatory problems.
RoHS focuses on restricted substances in electrical and electronic equipment. REACH provides a broader framework for managing chemical substances and related supply-chain obligations.
For manufacturers, the safest approach is not to assume that compliance with one means compliance with the other.
Instead, assess RoHS and REACH separately, connect the underlying product and supplier data, and maintain traceable evidence for each applicable requirement.
That approach gives compliance teams a clearer view of what has been assessed, what evidence supports the decision and where additional supplier information may still be required.
